Avodah = bucha do canhao de Sharon?
(Hanan Ashrawi - 27/2/01)
Hanan Ashrawi, respeitada líder palestina e
provável futura sucessora de Arafat, mostra que a participação minoritária dos
trabalhistas num governo determinado pela opção pela força que Sharon sempre adotou,
pode ser um suicídio político do maior partido de centro-esquerda de Israel.
Algumas frases destacadas do artigo completo, que vem a seguir :
"Shimon Peres, no less, has been selected (or has self-elected) to do the
dry-cleaning job as foreign minister in a government that does not bode well for Israel,
the region, or for peace as a whole.
Just as lethal is the notion of appointing a Labor minister of defense to carry out the
"dirty work" of the Sharon government.
Forming close to one-third of this right-wing government, Labor has thus been recruited as
apologists for the opposition and an instrument of its repression -a role no self
respecting "moderate" party would have contemplated, let alone fought for.
The "consensus" position will be formulated by the extreme political right in
conjunction with the fundamentalist religious elements, but will gain a hearing as
articulated by the "left."
It might contribute to the longevity of this right wing government, but it will
simultaneously fragment its own ranks.
Perhaps this is what Labor really needs-a painful opportunity to put its own house in
order by sifting its own membership and reformulating its future policies.
Perhaps the time has come for Labor to look within, to indulge in a genuine exercise of
self-examination, and even to fragment in order to regroup on a clear and sound peace
policy.
Perhaps the current opportunism and loss of bearings is a necessary step towards a more
honest reformulation-liberated from the legacy of occupation and patronizing domination.
Ultimately, the panic of the Israeli public will subside, and (it is hoped) more rational
minds will prevail once the dust settles and they realize the futility of maintaining
occupation and seeking security or of negating Palestinian rights and seeking peace.
Until then, we can only hope that this unholy alliance will not do irreparable damage to
the chances of peace within both Israel and Palestine."
Vale a pena ler o artigo inteiro.
Shalom, Moisés Storch
The Unholy Alliance: Labor in a
Likud-Led Government
By Dr. Hanan Ashrawi / MIFTAH / Jerusalem, February 27, 2001
On February 26, 2001, Israeli Labor Party's Central Committee voted by a two-third's
majority to join a "unity" government under the leadership of Likud's Ariel
Sharon.
Despite serious reservations and outright dissent by such Labor leaders as Shlomo Ben-Ami,
Yossi Beilin, Abraham Burg (among others), it appears that Israel's "moderate"
forces (let alone "peace camp") have opted for their docile cooption and
self-negation.
Having accepted a "junior partner" role in Sharon's right-wing government, Labor
has abandoned any claims to a "higher moral ground" and has become complicit in
Sharon's blood-drenched past and warmongering present.
By joining forces with such unlikely partners as Avigdor Lieberman and Rahba'am Ze'evi,
Labor has indirectly given a "green light" to the politics of hate, violence,
and racism.
Thus it presented Sharon and his crew with the badly needed fig leaf to present themselves
before the world as "presentable" within civilized society. Extremism has
therefore become an acceptable norm.
Shimon Peres, no less, has been selected (or has self-elected) to do the dry-cleaning job
as foreign minister in a government that does not bode well for Israel, the region, or for
peace as a whole.
Just as lethal is the notion of appointing a Labor minister of defense to carry out the
"dirty work" of the Sharon government.
Forming close to one-third of this right-wing government, Labor has thus been recruited as
apologists for the opposition and an instrument of its repression -a role no self
respecting "moderate" party would have contemplated, let alone fought for.
The Israeli public thus finds itself instantly deprived of an honest and active opposition
to seek as an alternative or as a corrective force when the extremists go on the rampage
or wreak havoc within Israel society and the region.
Democracy in Israel has been dealt yet another blow by those who had claimed to be its
most vociferous proponents.
Peace has been dealt a fatal blow by those who had claimed to seek it.
The real question is whether this is the true face of Labor or another depth to which it
had plummeted.
Having built more settlements than any previous government, and having resorted to more
bloodshed and brutality against the Palestinians than any other right- or left-wing party,
labor is now crowning its "achievements" with this unholy (though not entirely
surprising) alliance.
As had been the case with all Likud-led coalition governments, the left will be
marginalized or neutralized and the whole political discourse will shift to the right.
The "consensus" position will be formulated by the extreme political right in
conjunction with the fundamentalist religious elements, but will gain a hearing as
articulated by the "left."
Those who claim that such an alliance will curb the right wing and save the prospects for
peace are, at best, guilty of self-delusion. At worst, they have placed their personal
self-interest above those lofty objectives that they claim to serve.
By pretending to snatch "peace" from the jaws of war (or the Sharon gang), Labor
apologists had better remember that even in their own policies they had failed to meet the
minimal requirements of a just peace. By joining forces with an even more hard-line
government, they are making peace all that more unattainable while glossing over the
destructive agenda of their partners.
A cosmetic Labor might be more delusional than a party suffering from the intoxication of
power.
It might contribute to the longevity of this right wing government, but it will
simultaneously fragment its own ranks.
Perhaps this is what Labor really needs-a painful opportunity to put its own house in
order by sifting its own membership and reformulating its future policies.
As Palestinians, we have never suffered from the illusion that Labor is God's gift to
peace or is a Palestinian ally.
However, a "peace engagement" could have served to educate the peace camp in
Israel and to raise its awareness of the requirements of a genuine peace, thus shedding
its preconceived and inherited notions of an imposed peace by dictat or coercion.
Having missed this opportunity, Labor resorted to the harshest punitive measures and the
most violent means of repression, while indulging in a willful exercise of blaming the
victim and Palestinian bashing.
Instead of drawing the proper conclusions, Labor embraced Likud and opted for further
schizophrenic politics.
Perhaps the time has come for Labor to look within, to indulge in a genuine exercise of
self-examination, and even to fragment in order to regroup on a clear and sound peace
policy.
Perhaps the current opportunism and loss of bearings is a necessary step towards a more
honest reformulation-liberated from the legacy of occupation and patronizing domination.
Ultimately, the panic of the Israeli public will subside, and (it is hoped) more rational
minds will prevail once the dust settles and they realize the futility of maintaining
occupation and seeking security or of negating Palestinian rights and seeking peace.
When that happens, maybe there will be a few honest and brave individuals who will present
themselves as genuine candidates for a real peace camp.
Until then, we can only hope that this unholy alliance will not do irreparable damage to
the chances of peace within both Israel and Palestine. |
